GenAI governance blueprint microcourse
CA ANZ
Last updated September 6, 2026
GenAI governance blueprint is a self-paced microcourse from Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand and a component of its Certificate in AI Fluency. It begins by locating where the finance industry has reached in governing generative AI and where that is heading, then turns practical. Learners assess the risks particular to an AI deployment, design policies that hold risk management and innovation in balance, and build a governance and accountability framework flexible enough to survive the technology changing underneath it. Monitoring and review processes, and the cultural work of encouraging responsible use inside a team, complete it. It is a paid course, taken online and on demand.
Part 4 of 4 in CA ANZ's Certificate in AI Fluency
- Introduction to generative AI in finance microcourse
- Ethical use of generative AI microcourse
- Planning for GenAI implementation in finance microcourse
- GenAI governance blueprint microcourse (you are here)
What you'll learn
- Where the finance industry stands on generative AI governance, and what may come next
- Assessing risks specific to a generative AI deployment
- Designing policies that balance risk management against innovation
- Building a flexible governance and accountability framework
- Monitoring and review processes that keep a framework current
- Encouraging a culture of responsible AI use within a team
Frequently asked questions about GenAI governance blueprint microcourse
Who is GenAI governance blueprint microcourse for?
Finance leaders, risk managers and accountants responsible for setting generative AI policy in their organization; the content is not tied to a single jurisdiction.
Is GenAI governance blueprint microcourse free?
No — GenAI governance blueprint microcourse is a paid course.
Why we suggest this course
For accountants asked to write the rules for generative AI use in their organization — a task that lands on finance more often than on anyone else. The emphasis on flexibility is well judged, since a policy pinned to the tools of one moment ages badly, and monitoring and review are built in from the start. It ends on culture, because a governance framework nobody follows is a document rather than a control.